The Alfred Hitchcock Marathon (part two): Strangers on a Train (1951)

Strangers on a Train

The master of suspense made 54 feature films during his very long and celebrated career. Having only seen a couple of his films before I started this challenge, it is time for the author of this blog to become a lot more familiar with Mr. Hitchcock. The minimum goal will be to watch and review at least 24 of his films in 2013, though I will try to aim for 30. I will start with the must-watch classics, slowly making my way to the lesser known part of his work.

Strangers on a Train (1951) [ IMDB TOP 250 ]


Genre: Drama/ Suspense

Cast: Farley Granger (Guy Haines), Robert Walker (Bruno Antony), Ruth Roman (Anne Morton)

If North by Northwest was a very auspicious start to my Alfred Hitchcock marathon, Strangers on a Train is the clearest sign I could have gotten as to how worthwhile this journey might end up being.

Like North by Northwest and many other films directed by Hitchcock, Strangers on a Train revolves around the idea of being wrongfully accused of a crime, a subject matter that stems from an unusual phobia that tormented the master of cinema for most of his life.

Though there is still a bit of silliness and lightheartedness in the script, Strangers on a Train is a far more serious affair than North by Northwest. The genesis of the story comes from the very first scene in which two men casually meet on a train heading to New York. Guy Haines, played by Farley Granger, is a reserved and elegant local tennis star who is in the midst of a nasty divorce; while Bruno Antony, played by Robert Walker, is the bitter son of a New York magnate.

Despite the well documented hesitation Hitchcock felt when he cast these two actors for the lead roles, the effectiveness of the film contradicts the director’s initial reservations. Mr. Granger may not have been the most capable actor around, but he brought a sense of vulnerability and naivete that was essential to the role. Even better was Robert Walker in what was to be the last performance in his short-lived career and the one he is most remembered for. His Bruno Antony is the highlight of Strangers on a Train, creating one of the most iconic and creepy representations of evil in the history of cinema. Walker not only takes control of every scene he is a part of, but he makes us miss his character whenever he’s not around.

As it is to be expected, Hitchcock also delivers a very smart story filled with memorable sequences, most of which revolve around Bruno. There is, for instance, the first sequence at an amusement park where Hitchcock toys with his audience until he finally delivers the expected outcome. Through it all, Robert Walker becomes a hunter assessing the vulnerability of his prey. He patiently chases his victim as if he was a man struck by a case of love at first sight except that his eyes seem devoid of sexual desire. From the way he walks to the way he looks at the woman he wants to kill, Walker embodies this troubled man as if it was an extension of his persona.

In the reviews and analysis I have come across of Strangers on a Train, there seems to be as much interest in what is not said or presented to us than in the film itself. We never, for example, get to really know the cause behind Bruno’s pure hatred towards his father. Is he just a natural-born killer who uses his dad as the perfect excuse to commit murder? Or are his motivations strictly tied to the hatred he feels towards his father? And, if so, what triggered the desire to actually carry out his murderous plan?
There is also the almost obsessive manner in which Bruno seeks for Guy Haines during the whole film. Walker makes us believe there might be more under the surface than a simple chance meeting on a train. In fact, the way in which Hitchcock sets up the first sequence, there is good reason to believe the meeting wasn’t by chance at all and it was all part of Bruno’s clever plan. Upon meeting Haines, Bruno seems awe-struck, as if he had finally managed to find someone he shared something very peculiar with. Some critics even suggest that Hitchcock might have hinted at Bruno’s homoerotic tendencies. I, for one, attribute his behavior to a sense of longing. Bruno seems to me like a lonely man who has never truly grown independent from his rich parents and craves for a true friend.

Aside from the very last sequence on top of a merry-go-round which seems a bit rushed, Strangers on a Train flows seamlessly from one development to the next. Upon watching it a second time, I began to appreciate an entirely different level of detail that defines each and every sequence. Many of these are simple visual touches introduced by Hitchcock that may go unnoticed after only one viewing, but that imperceptibly add to the quality of the film.

Rating: 4.5/ 5 (masterful)

♦ Candidate to the Blog of Big Ideas’ Top 250 Films Ever ♦

Annex - Granger, Farley (Strangers on a Train)_04

8 thoughts on “The Alfred Hitchcock Marathon (part two): Strangers on a Train (1951)

  1. This is such a great film, and you’re right to mention the strength of Walker’s performance. I’m not sure I buy the fact that Bruno sought out Haines in particular with the plan in mind. I take his excitement in meeting him as genuine, and the homoeroticism is definitely there. You’re correct in pointing out Bruno’s loneliness, but I think he chooses Haines because he feels like he’s a comrade (in more ways than one). This is what makes him get even angrier when things don’t work out as planned. Along with not doing the murder, Haines has spurned his advances and wants nothing to do with Bruno.

    1. There’s definitely a longing for comradery that Bruno is looking to find in Haines, that I totally agree with. Where it gets blurry for me is whether this longing for a pal or friend comes attached with homo-eroticism.
      I think part of the success of the film is that we can all have different interpretations of their relationship and what drove them to do what they did but, in the end, there’s hardly a wrong or right answer.
      Thanks for stopping by.

  2. Great review Niels! You really made me think how much I’ve missed out on a bunch of Hitchcock’s greats. I should watch this at some point. Plus I quite like thrillers on trains!

  3. Thanks for the review and most of all for the inspiration. I am a big fan of Alfred Hitchcock, but I haven’t seen all of his movies and it has been a long time since I had made time for some of his classics. Have to change that and Strangers on a Train is a good start, thanks again.

    1. Strangers on a Train would be a fantastic start to get reacquainted with Hitchcock. I’m glad I finally watched the film and I’m sure you will be too.
      Thanks for stopping by my blog, hope to see you again in the future.

  4. This is a Hitchcock film that I badly need to see. Might give it a go next after Rebecca, which I have queued up in my project.

    I see you mentioned this is a candidate for your top 250 films — do you have this list published anywhere?

    1. If most of the Hitchcock films I have prepared to review are anywhere close to the quality of Strangers on a Train or North by Northwest, then I’m in for quite a wonderful cinematic ride.
      My top 250 list is an ever changing compendium of my absolute favorite films combined with those I don’t love as much but for which I have a great appreciation for. This list will be posted soon enough, but not yet as I still have quite a few classics I would like to cover before I do. I think we have to be more careful when we write stuff on the web because we can’t take it back once it’s published. So, with that in mind, I want to make sure my list is truly representative of my taste and I will publish it when I feel it’s a bit more comprehensive.
      Thanks for stopping by Eric!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s